What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

a b i 1 x []

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

Sed quia omnis delectus ad aliquam.

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Is the water safe to drink in England like here in America or is it necessary to bring tablets to prevent any cholera when in London?

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

Psilocybin induces large-scale brain network reorganization, offering insights into the psychedelic state - PsyPost

in structures, such as:

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

+ for

Analysts Look to Tesla’s Robotaxi Launch After Stock Hit From Musk-Trump Spat - Investopedia

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!